Regarding the state of the economy- a lot of what sucks about it right now is the bursting of the housing bubble, which has resulted in housing construction to dry up. What could really help get things moving again would be if someone were to make a program that was a graphical user interface for the housing code, something that translates from architectural regulation language to layman talk.
Oh look, a friend of mine did just that:
http://www.codecoachresidential.com
Definitely worth checking out if you're considering making some home improvements anytime soon.
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Friday, February 12, 2010
British libel reform petition
(a) British libel laws have been condemned by the UN Human Rights Committee.
(b) These laws gag scientists, bloggers and journalists who want to discuss matters of genuine public interest (and public health!).
(c) These laws give rise to libel tourism, whereby the rich and the powerful (Saudi billionaires, Russian oligarchs and overseas corporations) come to London to sue writers because British libel laws are so hostile to responsible journalism. (In fact, it is exactly because British libel laws have this global impact that we welcome signatories to the petition from around the world.)
(d) Vested interests can use their resources to bully and intimidate those who seek to question them. The cost of a libel trial in England is 100 times more expensive than the European average and typically runs to over £1 million.
(e) Three separate ongoing libel cases involve Simon Singh and two medical researchers raising concerns about three medical treatments. They face losing £1 million each. In future, why would anyone else raise similar concerns? If these health matters are not reported, then the public is put at risk.
Sign the petition
(b) These laws gag scientists, bloggers and journalists who want to discuss matters of genuine public interest (and public health!).
(c) These laws give rise to libel tourism, whereby the rich and the powerful (Saudi billionaires, Russian oligarchs and overseas corporations) come to London to sue writers because British libel laws are so hostile to responsible journalism. (In fact, it is exactly because British libel laws have this global impact that we welcome signatories to the petition from around the world.)
(d) Vested interests can use their resources to bully and intimidate those who seek to question them. The cost of a libel trial in England is 100 times more expensive than the European average and typically runs to over £1 million.
(e) Three separate ongoing libel cases involve Simon Singh and two medical researchers raising concerns about three medical treatments. They face losing £1 million each. In future, why would anyone else raise similar concerns? If these health matters are not reported, then the public is put at risk.
Sign the petition
Sunday, February 7, 2010
A little story about MetroPCS
So, last year from about February till around September I was on MetroPCS. I was content with their mediocre reception, but was always irked that while on the 45 $/month plan, I was actually paying around 52$ and change with taxes and fees. Then I saw that Boost's 50 $/month included taxes and fees. So I gave Boost a try and was again sufficiently satisfied.
Then this past week I notice that MetroPCS is advertising a plan 40$/month, taxes and fees included, with everything I want. Be still my beating heart, they know how to win me back. So Saturday, I return to MetroPCS. (The lovely sales rep who helped me get reconnected was very pleasant, by the way.) Then this morning, today, Sunday, I wake, try to make a call and get a "You have insufficient funds" message. How odd.
I take my phone back to the store with my receipt and am told that while I ordered and paid for the 40$ plan, the system actually has me on the 45$ plan, which is really weird because I was able to make and receive calls yesterday no problem. The guy who is helping me now asks his neighbor coworker who did this. His neighbor tells him who and wonders aloud why she did that. I notice him, the guy who's helping me murmur "I know why..." One mississippi. Two mississippi. Three mississippi. Ok, the suspense is killing me: "Why was that done?" I ask.
I won't forget what he said. Clearly I remember him saying "It's a confidential company policy."
Excuse me?! You mean there was a reason why I was overcharged? This was done intentionally, causing me miss calls for half a day, and making wait in line in this cramped crummy store for half an hour for this terse explanation? Whatever could this secret policy be? It couldn't be that there is a plan to get customers back in a store in the hope that they might buy some more stuff, could it? I try to get some clarification, but of course, it being confidential, get nothing. Just a "Okay, you're all set. Have a nice day."
Oh, MetroPCS. Alas, this rekindling of our love was so brief. Back to Boost I go.
Then this past week I notice that MetroPCS is advertising a plan 40$/month, taxes and fees included, with everything I want. Be still my beating heart, they know how to win me back. So Saturday, I return to MetroPCS. (The lovely sales rep who helped me get reconnected was very pleasant, by the way.) Then this morning, today, Sunday, I wake, try to make a call and get a "You have insufficient funds" message. How odd.
I take my phone back to the store with my receipt and am told that while I ordered and paid for the 40$ plan, the system actually has me on the 45$ plan, which is really weird because I was able to make and receive calls yesterday no problem. The guy who is helping me now asks his neighbor coworker who did this. His neighbor tells him who and wonders aloud why she did that. I notice him, the guy who's helping me murmur "I know why..." One mississippi. Two mississippi. Three mississippi. Ok, the suspense is killing me: "Why was that done?" I ask.
I won't forget what he said. Clearly I remember him saying "It's a confidential company policy."
Excuse me?! You mean there was a reason why I was overcharged? This was done intentionally, causing me miss calls for half a day, and making wait in line in this cramped crummy store for half an hour for this terse explanation? Whatever could this secret policy be? It couldn't be that there is a plan to get customers back in a store in the hope that they might buy some more stuff, could it? I try to get some clarification, but of course, it being confidential, get nothing. Just a "Okay, you're all set. Have a nice day."
Oh, MetroPCS. Alas, this rekindling of our love was so brief. Back to Boost I go.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
AIR / SQLite
A friend commented on how little documentation there is out there on AIR's built in database, SQLite. So here's my code example
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Gay marriage
A couple other friends have weighed in on this so I figured I'd throw in my take (inspired by Adam Carolla) :
Gay marriage - it's like this: I'm in Atlanta. I'm very aware of the Braves and the Hawks. I'm a fan of them; I love going to their games. Sports teams in any other city are really not on my radar. I don't boycott them, and I don't contact my congressman to prevent them from playing. Why? Because how, when and how well they play doesn't really affect me, personally, at all. I think the same is true of most people who want laws passed boycotting gay marriage- they don't want similar laws passed for sports teams in other cities- but they don't make this connection. It would be absurd for me to be morally against other sports teams, or other teams in general that don't affect me. Next time you're chatting with someone who is against gay marriage, ask them why they don't want legislation banning sports teams in other cities. Or if you are such a person, ask yourself that and please get right back to me.
Gay marriage - it's like this: I'm in Atlanta. I'm very aware of the Braves and the Hawks. I'm a fan of them; I love going to their games. Sports teams in any other city are really not on my radar. I don't boycott them, and I don't contact my congressman to prevent them from playing. Why? Because how, when and how well they play doesn't really affect me, personally, at all. I think the same is true of most people who want laws passed boycotting gay marriage- they don't want similar laws passed for sports teams in other cities- but they don't make this connection. It would be absurd for me to be morally against other sports teams, or other teams in general that don't affect me. Next time you're chatting with someone who is against gay marriage, ask them why they don't want legislation banning sports teams in other cities. Or if you are such a person, ask yourself that and please get right back to me.
Thursday, October 15, 2009
A couple random thoughts
1- Racecar drivers- are they required to wear seatbelts? I would think so. But suppose they weren't- would any of them choose not to wear their seatbelts? Considering how dangerous the sport is already, should they be allowed to make that choice in this hypothetical world? If not (for the driver's safety), then why are they allowed to race cars? Nevermind the excuse that they have to wear seatbelts to set a good example for the kids who watch- if that's the reason, then what kind of example does racing cars set? It's funny where people draw lines to rationalize what they love.
2- Suppose there is a land ruled by evil laws, and you have a good product to offer which, in its purest form, runs contrary to the evil laws, but can be watered down so as to not violate them. Is it more evil to go to the land and offer the watered down version, or not go there at all? Is either option not evil? I guess if you figure the good people ruled by the evil laws can find ways to get around the laws, then the best (least evil) thing is to do what Google does. The lesson they teach is: when confronted with an insurmountable monster, subvert with a smile rather than fight with pressure of absence. Is this a good lesson? That is, if confronted with something I don't like, something I figure I won't be able to change any other way as effectively, is this what I should do?
UPDATES:
According to this, Google would be out of China by 2010 April 10. Today is the 11th. Google is not out of China but google.cn is no longer serving censored results. Or any results. It's redirecting to uncensored Hong Kong. More info here, here, and here. It's a sticky situation, but again, probably the best way possible.
2- Suppose there is a land ruled by evil laws, and you have a good product to offer which, in its purest form, runs contrary to the evil laws, but can be watered down so as to not violate them. Is it more evil to go to the land and offer the watered down version, or not go there at all? Is either option not evil? I guess if you figure the good people ruled by the evil laws can find ways to get around the laws, then the best (least evil) thing is to do what Google does. The lesson they teach is: when confronted with an insurmountable monster, subvert with a smile rather than fight with pressure of absence. Is this a good lesson? That is, if confronted with something I don't like, something I figure I won't be able to change any other way as effectively, is this what I should do?
UPDATES:
According to this, Google would be out of China by 2010 April 10. Today is the 11th. Google is not out of China but google.cn is no longer serving censored results. Or any results. It's redirecting to uncensored Hong Kong. More info here, here, and here. It's a sticky situation, but again, probably the best way possible.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)